- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 23:58, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Motive Motion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not satisfying any of the conditions in WP:BAND. Muhandes (talk) 15:48, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 12:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I can't find any significant coverage for this band in reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:BAND at this time. Gongshow Talk 15:47, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 23:26, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:23, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:BAND. If by any chance it's kept then it needs major rewriting, as it currently reads like self-publicity. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 13:16, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.