Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas W. Hubbard

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Rough consensus that sufficient sourcing (primarily in the form of published reviews) to satisfy WP:AUTHOR. (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 10:57, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas W. Hubbard

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG as far as I can find. —Мандичка^YO 😜 05:56, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:16, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. – numbermaniac 08:12, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. – numbermaniac 08:12, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Google Scholar shows that subject's 2009 and 2014 books have over 800 citations each, raising the possibility of notability under WP:AUTHOR#1. Bakazaka (talk) 19:06, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:01, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added searchbars after seeing the last paragraph of this [1] article in the The New York Times Book Review.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:20, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:39, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. I added six published book reviews for three of his books to the article. It's a little borderline but I think he passes WP:AUTHOR. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:41, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: meets WP:NAUTHOR with substantive reviews of his books. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:33, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think those book reviews carry him past WP:AUTHOR.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:18, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas W. Hubbard

Douglas W. Hubbard

zproxy.org